Writers Den

SOCI 215 Social Deviance

Assignment 2: Deviance – Experiential Learning

Assignment Overview:

Social interaction proceeds fluidly in everyday life, because people have shared definitions of and expectations about routine situations. As we go about our day, we generally assume that people are going to behave a certain way and observe certain norms. When they don’t, we may sometimes know how to respond, because we have seen that kind of violation before. For example, if someone cuts in front of us in line, we probably already know how we would react to that breach of common courtesy.

But other norms are so ingrained and automatic that we can hardly imagine anyone breaking them. Because we have never been confronted with the behavior, we have no pre-set idea of how to react when someone fails to behave “normally.” For instance, if you were sitting in a near-empty movie theater and a stranger suddenly sat down directly beside you, how would you react? Chances are, you have no idea, because it’s just not something people do.

This assignment calls for you to breach a social norm, either by doing something one is notsupposed to do, OR by notdoing something that is considered standard behavior in that particular situation.

ALTERNATIVE ASSIGNMENT:

If you are physically unable to perform any type of norm breaching experiment, you may analyze an example of norm breaching in the media in a film, television show, literary novel, or other form of media. Directions given below.

Assignment Instructions: Preparation

1) Think of a social norm to violate. It should be a situation where everyone knows what the appropriate behavior would be without having to think about it, with the limitation that it cannot be anything illegal or harmful to yourself or others: we are examining LEGAL deviance only in this assignment.

You may find this site to be helpful in thinking about social norm violations. It gives information on the norm breaching experiments of Harold Garfinkel and others who studied this phenomenon:

https://www.revolvy.com/main/index.php?s=Breaching%20experiment

2) Violate the norm you chose over a long enough time to permit yourself to observe at least three reactions from others. (If you are having trouble getting people to react, then your behavior isn’t really a norm violation, and you should try a different one.) Important: do not tell anyone what you are doing, or that this is an assignment. You should behave as if what you are doing is normal to you.You should bring something to write on such as a cell phone or notebook so that you can take notes on other people’s reactions and your own personal feelings throughout the process. When you are finished, your task is to develop a 5 page paper write-up about this experiment (not including title and reference pages).

FOR ALTERNATIVE ASSIGNMENT:

Think of a social norm that you have seen violated in a film, television show, literary novel, or other form of media. It should be a situation where everyone knows what the appropriate behavior would be without having to think about it, with the exception of the character who is violating the norm.

You may find this site to be helpful in thinking about social norm violations. It gives information on the norm breaching experiments of Harold Garfinkel and others who studied this phenomenon:

https://www.revolvy.com/main/index.php?s=Breaching%20experiment

Observe this norm violation in the media you selected long enough to note at least three reactions from other characters. You should have something to write on such as a cell phone or notebook so that you can take notes about other people’s reactions and your own personal feelings throughout the process. When you are finished, your task is to develop a 5 page paper write-up about this experiment (not including title and reference pages).

Assignment Instructions: Paper

1) In your paper, under the subheading ofMethod: Include a 1 paragraph overview explaining what you did and how you did it. Explain whichnorm you violated—i.e., what is normally done vs. what you did differently.

2) Under the subheading ofFindings: Include a 1 page analysis that includes:

• Your personal feelings: how did you feel before engaging in your norm violation, during it, and afterward?
• Other people’s reactions during the violation. Did anything unusual or substantial happen because of the norm violation? How did you know what people were thinking and feeling about the violation? Were there any notable patterns that arose in people’s reactions?

3) Under the subheading ofDiscussion: Include a 4 page analysis in which you reflect on your findings. Using the course concepts and ideas discussed and read thus far, how can you understand and interpret the interactions of others? How can you understand your own experience/feelings about norm breaching? In this discussion, you must:

• Clearly apply at least 3 relevant sociological concepts/theories from our course materials/readings to the deviant behavior you analyzed in this experiment.
• Clearly apply findings from at least 5 meaningful up-to-date resources, 3 of which are from reputable academic journals, tothe deviant behavior you analyzed in this experiment.

NOTE: do not include the actual notes you took during the observations. You need to analyze and discuss the notes, but not include/list them in your paper.

Do not use unverifiable, secondary sites such as Wikipedia,about.com,ask.com, and similar. Use our course materials, peer-reviewed journal articles from the library, and other scholarly sources.

Your presentation should utilize sound critical thought and it should include appropriate APA in-text citations and full APA references at the end.

FOR ALTERNATIVE ASSIGNMENT:

In your paper, under the subheading ofMethod: Include a 1 paragraph overview explaining what media you analyzed. Explain whichnorm was violated—i.e., what is normally done vs. what was done differently.

2) Under the subheading ofFindings: Include a 1 page analysis that includes:

• Your personal feelings: how did you feel while observing the norm violation during it, and afterward?
• Other people’s reactions during the violation. Did anything unusual or substantial happen because of the norm violation? How did you know what other characters were thinking and feeling about the violation? Were there any notable patterns that arose in people’s reactions?

3) Under the subheading ofDiscussion: Include a 4 page analysis in which you reflect on your findings. Using the course concepts and ideas discussed and read thus far, how can you understand and interpret the interactions of others? How can you understand your own experience/feelings about norm breaching? In this discussion, you must:

• Clearly apply at least 3 relevant sociological concepts/theories from our course materials/readings to the deviant behavior you analyzed in this experiment.
• Clearly apply findings from at least 5 meaningful up-to-date resources, 3 of which are from reputable academic journals, tothe deviant behavior you analyzed in this experiment.

NOTE: do not include the actual notes you took during the observations. You need to analyze and discuss the notes, but not include/list them in your paper.

Do not use unverifiable, secondary sites such as Wikipedia,about.com,ask.com, and similar. Use our course materials, peer-reviewed journal articles from the library, and other scholarly sources.

Your presentation should utilize sound critical thought and it should include appropriate APA in-text citations and full APA references at the end.

Grading Rubric

CATEGORY	Outstanding	Above Average	Average	Below Average	Unacceptable
Method and Findings	Correctly chose a form of legal social deviance, included good detail and informed rationale of Method and Findings (5 pts.)	Correctly chose a form of legal social deviance; detail and informed rationale of Method and/or Findings needed some elaboration statement adequate (4 pts.)	Choice of legal social deviance, description and/or rationale of Methods and/or Findings lacked clarity in some areas and needed elaboration (3 pts.)	Choice of social deviance unclear or incorrect, description and/or rationale of Methods and/or Findings not clear, needs much elaboration (2 pts.)	Choice of social deviance incorrect, and/or little or no description or rationale of Methods and Findings included (0-1 pts.)
Analysis Using Concepts/ Theories	Clearly applied at least three relevant sociological concepts/theories from the readings to deviant behavior. (7 points)	Clearly applied three concepts/theories, some explanation needed (6 pts.)	Somewhat applied three concepts/theories, some inaccuracies or elaboration needed. (5 pts.)	Clearly applied one concept or theory; second concept/theory is partial. (4-1 pts.)	Did not clearly apply sociological concepts/theories to analysis of current event. (0-1 pts.)
Application of Research	Clearly applied findings from at least 5 meaningful up-to-date resources, 3 of which are from reputable academic journals. (7 points)	Applied findings from 5 meaningful up-to-date resources, 3 of which are from reputable academic journals, but some explanation needed (6 pts.)	Somewhat applied findings of at least four acceptable resources; applications include inaccuracies or elaboration needed. (5 pts.)	Applied at least three acceptable resources; applications may be incomplete or inaccurate. (4 –1 pts.)	Applied one or two resources or did not apply acceptable research outside of that found in our text. (0-1 pts.)
APA Formatted Citations and References	Included APA formatted in-text citations and full references for ALL paraphrased and quoted work from other sources. Sources are appropriate for this assignment. (3 pts.)	Minor errors in APA formatting of citations and/or references. (2.5 pts.)	Multiple errors in APA formatting of citations and/or references. (2 pts.)	Missing some citations and/or references, and errors in APA formatting. (1.5 – 1 pts.)	No citations and/or references included. (0 pts.)
Grammar, Spelling, Proper Formatting	Author makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Paper is properly formatted. (3 pts.)	Author makes a couple errors in grammar, spelling or format that distract the reader from the content. (2.5 pts.)	Author makes a few errors in grammar, format or spelling that distract the reader from the content. (2 pts.)	Author makes multiple errors in grammar, format or spelling that distract the reader from the content. (1.5 – 1 pts.)	Authors makes so many errors in grammar, format and spelling that the intent of the paper cannot be understood. (0 pts.)