Define ethical relativism.
Which corrupt behavior did you choose?
Is the corrupt behavior you identified considered normal behavior?
If so, by whom?
Does the fact that the behavior is or is not normal make it
good or bad behavior?
If the majority considered the corrupt behavior as
acceptable, would it no longer be considered corrupt?
In American culture, is there a simple majority rule, or are
there subcultures within American culture that can influence what is considered
the majority rule?
Applying the concepts of ethical relativism, how would you
suggest preventing or limiting the corruption issue you chose?
In your opinion, is ethical relativism a good method for
preventing or limiting the corruption issue you chose, or is there another
theory that may work better under these circumstances?
Please do your work in APA format. Please proofread your
word to make certain that the grammar and spelling are correct
