SOCIOLOGY
331
RESEARCH METHODS FOR SOCIOLOGY
HW3:
Questionnaire (25 points):
Due
no later than 11:59pm EST on Sunday of Week 7 – submit using link in Educator
AND using www.turnitin.com
PURPOSE: The purpose of exercise is to develop
a short questionnaire containing both close-ended survey questions and
open-ended questions. Students will go
through the research design process from research question, to survey
construction, to analysis of survey results and theory building using a
peer-reviewed article. Tips on Finding a Peer Reviewed Journal Article may be
found under Course Materials>Resources.
Requirements:
Your assignment should
include
–
ALL sections 1-11
This assignment does NOT
have to be written in essay format. You
may organize it by section, question number with question text, and then your
answer.
APA formatting should be
used throughout. Any time your
paraphrase or directly quote a source (such as your article), in-text citations
should be used. A full APA-formatted reference
should be included at the beginning or end of assignment. See Course Materials>Resources for APA
Tips.
For classes with 4 or
more students, you may partner in groups of 2-3 students, with instructor
approval. This does change some of the
requirements – see below.
1. Research Question
1)
Develop a clear, specific, sociological research
question that will investigate the relationship between two social
phenomena/behaviors/facts.
2. Conceptual and
Operational Definitions
2)
Clearly identify the variables in your research
question
3)
Identify which variable is your independent variable,
and which variable is your dependent variable.
4)
Provide a conceptual definition for each variable.
(i.e. similar to dictionary definition)
5)
Describe what ‘type’ of variable each variable is.
6)
Provide an operational definition for each
variable. (i.e. how the variable is
going to be measured)
3. Hypothesis
7)
Develop a hypothesis for your research question – a
statement of what direction you believe the relationship between your two
variables will be.
4. Questionnaire
Construction
8)
Develop 5-10 closed-ended questions (*for groups: 10-15
questions)
a.
Some of these should measure basic socio-demographic
characteristics (i.e. age, race/ethnicity, gender, SES)
b.
The rest should be indicators for your variables
c.
These should be constructed based on the ‘type’ of
variable you are measuring.
9)
Develop 2-5 open-ended questions for to help measure
your variables (* for groups: 3-7 questions)
a.
This is going to help provide some rich qualitative
information and serve as a check for the internal validity of your close-ended
questions
5. Sampling Design
10) Describe
your population, sampling frame, and method
11) Describe
your sample
6. Administer the
Questionnaire
12) Have
3-5 people complete your questionnaire. (*for groups: 10 people per person)
a.
This may be done face-to-face where you ask the
questions, the respondent answers, and you record the information
b.
This may be done via a form that people fill out (i.e.
it could have been sent to some friends/family via email or handed to them in
the kitchen)
c.
When asking people to complete the questionnaire, you
need to inform them that it is VOLUNTARY, and their identity will be kept
confidential
i.
Do not put a place for name on the questionnaire
7. Compile the
results of your questionnaire into a table
13) This
provides you with a simple count
14) *For
groups only: consolidate data and consult with professor by Week 6 about data
analysis.
Sample Table
|
Indicators |
Respondent 1 |
Respondent 1 |
|
|
Socio-demographic measures |
|||
|
|
Age |
38 |
24 |
|
|
Gender |
female |
Male |
|
|
Etc. |
||
|
Variable 1 |
|||
|
|
Measured |
C |
A |
|
|
Q3 |
D |
B |
|
|
Q8 |
R1 |
R2 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Variable 1 |
Measured |
5 |
29 |
|
Q5 |
3 |
7 |
|
|
Etc. |
8. Analyze the
results of your questionnaire (see chapter 12)
15) Provide
descriptive statistics (counts) of the responses
16) Identify
trends in the data results
17) Conduct
a chi-square test (OPTIONAL)
18) How
do these results help you to answer your research question
9. Peer-Reviewed
Article
19) Find
1 peer-reviewed article that is related to your research question.
20) Briefly
describe the article (thesis/research question, hypothesis, methods, findings)
21) Compare
and discuss the methods and findings of the article to your own small study
10. Discussion
22) Briefly
summarize the research purposes, methodologies, and key findings (in a
non-statistical manner) of your study
23) What
are the strengths of your study and findings
24) What
are the weaknesses of your study and findings
25) Discuss
implications for future research on your research question
11. Reflection
26) Briefly
discuss what you learned about research methods through this assignment.
Grading Rubric
|
CATEGORY |
Outstanding |
Above Average |
Average |
Below Average |
Unacceptable |
|
Completed both |
2 pts |
1.6 |
1.4 |
1.2 |
0-1 |
|
Observation |
Provided thick description of observations/content analysis with |
Needed some elaboration on either social setting or |
Need significantly more detail about social setting or |
Summary of observations lacks detail overall. (3pt) |
No summary of norm breaking behavior included (0-2 pts) |
|
Research Question |
Clearly identified a specific, measurable research problem. (3 |
Clearly identified research problem. (2.5 pts) |
Identified a research problem; it needs some refining/ |
Research problem unclear, not easily measured. (1.5 pts) |
Research problem not specified or very unclear (0-1 pts) |
|
Variables |
Clearly identified and |
Clearly identified and operationalized 2 variables that are |
Identified and operationalized 2 variables that are from the |
Missing one variable or operationalization; or variables not |
Variables incorrect; missing operationalizations; variables |
|
Hypothesis |
Succinct hypothesis predicts relationship between two+ |
(1.6 pts) |
Hypothesis not in statement form; needs to more clearly specify |
Hypothesis unclear; does not specify relationship. (1.2) |
Hypothesis not related or missing (0-1pts) |
|
Analysis |
Clearly applied relevant sociological theory(ies) to analysis of |
(4 pts) |
Need to more clearly use sociological theory(ies) to analyze |
Analysis based entirely on opinion, or application to theory |
Did not apply sociological theory to analysis. (0-2 pts) |
|
Reflection |
Included discussion of your experience of the situation (1pts) |
(.8) |
Need to elaborate on your experience of the situation (.7 pt) |
(.6) |
No discussion of your experience of the situation (0-.5 pts) |
|
Compared |
Thoughtful discussion about differences between the two |
Needed some elaboration |
Need significant elaboration about differences between two |
Discussion lacks clarity and detail overall. (1.5 pt) |
No discussion of comparison (0-1 pts) |
|
APA Formatted |
Included APA formatted in-text citations and full references for |
Minor errors in APA formatting of citations. (.8 pts) |
Multiple errors in APA formatting of citations. (.7 pt) |
Missing some citations, and errors in APA formatting. (.6 pts) |
No citations included. (0-.5 pts) |
