Inductive Argumentation
Inductive arguments take specific
premises to make general conclusions. A strong inductive argument is most
probably the case, and a weak inductive argument is most likely not the case. A
causal inductive argument is very similar. It works like this: When X happens
then Y happens. X probably causes Y.
Consider these two causal
inductive arguments:
1. Every day of my life, the sun
has risen in the morning. Tomorrow morning is another day; therefore the sun
will probably rise.
2. Every time I flick this switch,
the living room light goes on. Therefore this switch probably controls the
living room light.
Discussion:
1. Do these arguments seem
obvious? Why or why not?
2. Understanding the structure of
inductive arguments, how do you rate the strength or weakness of perceived
causal relationships within arguments?
Remember to support your answers
with logic, examples, and arguments.
