0 Comments

Assignment 1: Pricing and Brand Equity

    Firms often look for ways to improve the return on
    investment in costly innovation strategies. Barone and Jewell (2013)
    investigated a previously unexplored benefit of innovation that occurs when a
    brand’s reputation as a provider of valued new offerings allows it to earn
    innovation credit, a form of customer-based brand equity.

    Innovation credit provides brands with the license or
    latitude to use strategies that violate category norms without the penalty (in
    the form of impaired attitudes) that consumers have been shown to levy on less
    innovative brands. Consistent with the proposed theoretical framework, the
    authors posited in three studies that innovative brands are granted the license
    to employ nonnormative strategies without consumer sanction. In addition to
    providing evidence regarding the inferential mechanism underlying this
    licensing effect, one study shows that, under certain conditions, innovative
    brands not only escape the penalty associated with using atypical strategies
    but are actually rewarded for utilizing such approaches.

    Review the following:

    Barone, M. J., & Jewell, R. D. (2013). The innovator’s
    license: A latitude to deviate from category norms. Journal of Marketing,
    77(1), 120–134.

    https://login.libproxy.edmc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.edmc.edu

    /docview/1268837962?accountid=34899

    Use the Argosy University online library resources to
    identify two peer-reviewed journal articles on the concept of the innovator’s
    license.

    Complete the following:

    Critically analyze the value of the innovation and branding
    approach suggested by Barone and Jewell. Be sure to provide your inputs on the
    pros and cons.

    Compare the authors approach to the other approaches you are
    familiar with.

    Assess how the Barone and Jewell approach could be applied
    to your own organization.

    Discuss what might work and what is not applicable in their
    approach.

    Support your positions with at least two peer-reviewed
    journal articles.

    Write your initial response in 300–500 words. Your response
    should be thorough and address all components of the discussion question in
    detail, include citations of all sources, where needed, according to the APA
    Style, and demonstrate accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation

    Do the following when responding to your peers:

    Read your peers’ answers.

    Provide substantive comments by

    contributing new, relevant information from course readings,
    Web sites, or other sources;

    building on the remarks or questions of others; or

    sharing practical examples of key concepts from your
    professional or personal experiences

    Respond to feedback on your posting and provide feedback to
    other students on their ideas.

    Make sure your writing

    is clear, concise, and organized;

    demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation
    and attribution of sources; and

    displays accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

    Order Solution Now

    Categories: