Details:
The following is a list of acceptable topics that can be
selected from. (Please note that this is a list of suggestions. A different
topic can be selected if you have a preference for a topic that is not listed):
Right to Die
Drug Therapy
Children and Medication
Diagnosis of ADHD
Television or Video Games and Violent Behavior
Using Deception in Research
Spanking
Using Animals in Research
Recovered Memories
Use the GCU library to locate two peer-reviewed articles on
your chosen topic. The articles should argue opposite sides of the controversy.
In 1,250-1,500 words:
Briefly explain the claims of both articles as well as the
background of the controversy and how it became controversial. Including how
historical perspectives and theories add to the controversy.
Examine the evidence given in the articles and explain which
article creates a stronger argument.
Identify any logic fallacies that exist in both and explain
what makes them logic fallacies (For a list of logical fallacies, follow this
link https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/659/03/).
Describe why the article’s argument is stronger than the
other. Give examples from both. Include how current perspectives and theories
support your rationale.
Describe how the controversy you chose is applicable and
significant to the world.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in
the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not
required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric
prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
This benchmark assignment assesses the following
programmatic competencies: 1.1: Describe key historical perspectives and
theories in psychology, 1.2: Differentiate among current perspectives and
theories in psychology, and 1.3: Describe applications of psychology.
