|
Part 3: Diagnosing the |
Select a Diagnostic Model (see
Chapter Five) that you utilize to review aspects of change activities and
actions that have been taken by the companies chosen. Here we are looking at
the “parts” of the companies as well as their strategies, as surmised by your
research in Part 1. It is acknowledged that this information will not be
complete, as you are looking at these companies as an outsider; but a
thoroughly researched paper will give enough data to allow some (well-defended)
assumptions on your part.
Here’s what to do:
1. Choose one Diagnostic Model
(i.e. 6-box, 7S, congruence, or etc.) to apply to the two chosen companies.
Choose the model which you feel best identifies and measures the relevant
aspects of the organization’s performance and therefore the diagnostic choices
made will affect your findings.
2. Apply the data obtained in
your research through an analysis of the appropriate chosen model. This will
allow you to create a diagnosis of where each company is today (as per the
criteria of the model).
3. Create a SWOT Analysis for
each of the two chosen companies change plans/programs, utilizing information
obtained in the diagnosis. (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats.)
4. Compare the two company
analyses to each other and offer your perspective (value judgment) of the
effectiveness of the changes made to date in each case.
5. Identify potential areas of
resistance that may occur and at least one strategy to respond to each. (This
will most likely come from your Weaknesses/Threats section of your SWOT. If
not, take another look at your SWOT.)
6. Write your paper including each of the above
sections, and analyses
Grading rubric for paper #3 –
Diagnosing the Change:
|
Item |
Total points |
|
A comprehensive review of |
20 |
|
Your rationale defending why |
20 |
|
A SWOT analysis that you |
20 |
|
Potential areas of |
20 |
|
Recommendations for further |
20 |
|
Use of 4 new references, |
10 |
|
Total Points |
110 |
