NR541 Interview with Informatics Nurse Specialist (INS)

September 28, 2025 Claire B 0 Comments

Interview
with
Informatics

Nurse Specialist (INS)

GuidelineswithRubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is for the
learner to:

·
Evaluate
the extent to which the INS functionsas member,
leader, and/or decision-maker of an Interdisciplinary
and/or interprofessional team;

·
Compare
interviewee functional roles against NI functional roles Identified within the
current scope and standards of informatics practice statement for the INS;

·
Examine three
nursing-informatics (NI) functional roles that the INS demonstrates in clinical
practice;

·
Summarize the link between
nursing theory and nursing informatics roles; and

·
Summarize insights gained from
the interview in relationship to the INS role and practice

DUE
DATE

Sunday,11:59p.m.MTattheendofWeek2

Total Points Possible: 150

Directions

1. Interview
(by telephone or in person) a master or doctorally prepared informatics nurse
specialist. Summarize the interview in a three to four-page report, including:

2. Identify
the degree of interdisciplinary and interprofessional collaboration the INS has.

3. Identify
the INS’ predominant functional areas of practice and how these compare with NI
functional areas defined in the American Nurses Association’s 2015 Nursing
Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice (2nd ed.).

4. Compare
what you learned in the interview to what you have read.

5. Provide
a link between nursing theory and nursing informatics roles.

CriteriaforContent

1.
Introductionpresentsthetopicof the
scope and standards of informatics practice inclusive offunctionalareas, thekeysectionsofthepaper,andtheinterviewee without
disclosing either their name or the name of their organization.

2.
Key elements of the interview are summarized
with an emphasis on describing the NI functional roles in which the interviewee
practices that include functional areas, practice within the scope and
standards of nursing informatics practice, and degree to which the interviewee
functions as a member of an interdisciplinary/interprofessional team as an MSN
level leader and decision-maker.

3.
Scholarly, evidence-based resources will
support content, opinions, and conclusions. Differences and similarities
between the interview information collected and published descriptions are
analyzed and paraphrased in the student’s own words, with scholarly citation
and references, including support for opinions.

4.
Conclusion includes the student’s unique
insights about what was learned from writing the assignment.

CriteriaforFormatandSpecialInstructions

1.
Requiredtextsmaybeusedasreferences in addition to evidence-based,
scholarly sources no older than three years.

2.
Allaspects
ofthepapermustbein 6^th
edition, 7^th printingAPAformat
including appropriate attribution of ideas, information, opinions, and content.

3.
Thepaper(excludingthetitlepageandreferencepage)shouldnotbelongerthan four pages
or less than three pages.

4.
Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and writing
style is consistent with formal academic writing.

Directions and Assignment Criteria

Assignment Criteria	Points	%	Description
Introduction	34	23%	Theintroductionintroducesthetopicof the scope and standards of informatics practice, inclusive ofNIfunctional areas,andtheintervieweenamesthekeysections ofthepaper. No names are included to protect identity and privacy.
Interview Results	34	23%	Keyelementsoftheinterviewaresummarized withanemphasisondescribingthree primaryNIfunctionalareas, practice within the scope and standards of NI practiceinwhichtheintervieweepractices, as well as interdisciplinary/interprofessional efforts.Scholarlysupportispresent.
Analysis	34	23%	Differencesandsimilarities betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctionalareas and scope and standards of practice andactualpracticeof the intervieweeareclearlyanalyzedinthestudent’sownwords,with depth,and analysisissupportedbyscholarlysources.
Conclusion	33	22%	Concludingstatementsclearly includethewriter’suniqueinsightsaboutNIfunctionalareasandthepracticeofnursinginformaticsgained fromcompletingthisassignment.
APA Formats	5	3%	Text,title page,andreferencepage(s)areconsistentwithAPAformat(zero to threeerrors).
Citations	5	3%	Ideasandinformationfrom othersourcesarecited andarecited correctly(zero to three errors).
Writing Mechanics	5	3%	Rulesofgrammar,spelling,wordusage,andpunctuationareconsistentwith formalwrittenwork(zero to threeerrors), paper meets page length.
Total	150	100%

Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria	Exceptional (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance	Exceeds (88%) Very good or high level of performance	Meets (80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance	Needs Improvement (38%) Poor or failing level of performance	Developing (0) Unsatisfactory level of performance
Introduction	34 Points	30 Points	27 Points	13 Points	0 Points
Introduction clearly introducesthetopicofNIfunctionalareas, identifiestheintervieweebyrole (not name)andtypeoforganization, andnamesthekeysectionsofthepaper.	Introduction clearlypresentsonlytwo oftherequired sections.	Introduction clearlypresentsonlyone oftherequired sections.	Introduction doesnotclearly addressanyofthethreerequiredsections.	Nointroductionispresent.
Interview Results	34 Points	30 Points	27 Points	13 Points	0 Points
Key elements of the interview are summarized with the three primary NI functional areas of INS practice described clearly. Exemplars of interdisciplinary/interprofessional collaboration are included. Scholarly support.is present and relevant. .	Key elements of the interview are summarized. The NI functional areas in which the interviewee practices are mentioned but not clearly described. Interdisciplinary/ interprofessional collaboration is mentioned but not elaborated. Scholarly sources are provided but support is not clearly stated	Functional areas of practice are not addressed OR There is no mention of Interdisciplinary/ interprofessional role or collaboration. Scholarly sources are present but support is not well-established.	Key elements of the interview are not present, OR the interview summary lacks scholarly support.	Interview results are not present.
Analysis	34 Points	30 Points	27 Points	13 Points	0 Points
Differencesand/orsimilarities betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctional areasandactual practiceofthose functionalareasareclearlyanalyzedin-depth. Theanalysisissupportedby scholarlysources.	Differencesand/orsimilarities betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctional areasandactual practiceofthose functionalareasareanalyzedsuperficially. Analysisissupportedbyscholarlysources.	Differencesand/orsimilarities betweenpublished descriptionsofNIfunctionalareasandactualpracticeofthosefunctionalareasarepresentedbutnotanalyzed.Scholarlysupportispresent.	Differencesand/orsimilarities betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctional areasandactual practiceofthose functionalareasare notpresented, ORscholarlysupportisnotpresentinthissection.	An analysis is not present.
Conclusion	33 Points	29 Points	27 Points	13 Points	0 Points
Concluding statements clearly include the writer’s unique insights about NI functional areas and the practice of nursing informatics gained from completing this assignment.	Concluding statements include statements about NI functional areas and the practice of nursing informatics, but lack clear presentation of the writer’s unique insights gained from completing this assignment.	Conclusion partially addresses either functional areas or writer’s insights.	Conclusion is present but does not address either functional areas or writer’s insights.	Conclusion is not present.
APA Formats	5 Points	4 Points	3Points		0 Points
Zero to twoerrors ofAPAformatintext,title page,andreference page(s).	Three to fiveAPAformaterrors intext,titlepage, andreference page(s).	Six to sevenAPAformaterrors intext,titlepage, orreference page(s).	Nine or moreAPAformaterrorsin text,titlepage,or referencepages(s).
Citations	5 Points	4 Points	3Points		0 Points
Allideasandinformation fromothersourcesarecited.	One to threeinstancesinwhichideasandinformationfrom othersourcesarenotcited or lackmatching.references	Four to sixinstancesinwhichideasandinformationfrom othersourcesarenotcitedorlackmatching references.		Seven or moreinstancesinwhichideasandinformation fromothersourcesarenotcited or lack matching references.
Writing Quality	5 Points	4 Points	3Points		0 Points
Zero to three errorsingrammar, spelling,wordusage, punctuation,andotherelementsofwritingAND papermeetslength requirement	Four to sixerrors ingrammar,spelling,wordusage,punctuation,andotherelementsofwriting ANDpapermeetslength requirements	Seven to nineerrors ingrammar,spelling,wordusage,punctuation,andotherelementsofwriting ANDpapermeetslength. requirements		Ten or moreerrorsingrammar, spelling,wordusage,punctuation,andother elementsofwriting, OR paperfails tomeetlength requirements.
150 Total Points _____ of 150 Points

Share:

Categories:

Nursing

Writers Den

NR541 Interview with Informatics Nurse Specialist (INS)

Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A