settings: group settings in a correctional environment, individual therapyin
the correctional environment, group settings in the outpatient setting, and
individual therapy in the outpatient setting. While many sex offenders are
mandated to complete treatment, some sex offenders are willing to participate
in order to lead more normal lives. Treatment approaches, however, can be
affected by available resources in a particular setting. For example, many
offender programs rely on group interventions because of cost effectiveness as
well as treatment efficacy.
In addition to group and individual treatment approaches,
there are other evidence-based intervention approaches for certain sex offenders.
For example, certain sex offenders may be good candidates for pharmacological
interventions. The use of antidepressants, hormones, and various other
pharmacological agents can help the offender to achieve greater self-control of
their inappropriate sexual impulses. Some sexual offender treatment programs
use biofeedback approaches that measure sexual responses. Still other treatment
programs use a combination approach in which group therapy is the core of the
experience, with individual interventions augmenting the treatment process.
One advantage to utilizing an array of treatment approaches
is the amount of empirical research used to support, alter, or discontinue a
given intervention. Many programs and approaches have been evaluated in several
different treatment settings to address the efficacy of the intervention. But
each study is unique in how it measures success, for example, recidivism,
relapse, or harm-reduction. Fortunately, sex offender treatment is an area of
research that has continued to receive attention as a result of increased
interest since the passing of Megan’s Law and other, similar legislation.
Provide a description of the research article you selected.
Include the type of sex offender and treatment approach. Then explain which treatment
outcome model you would use to measure program success and why.
