Review the Wiedmer article
regarding workplace bullying.
Develop a two- to three-page
APA- formatted paper that responds to the following:
·
Provide a review of the
article. Describe the impact of workplace bullying on both the victims and the
organization.
·
Reflect on a time when you may
have witnessed workplace bullying. Discuss at least two practices of workplace
bullying addressed in the article that were applicable to your scenario.
·
Recommend at least two
techniques from the article that management should implement to provide a
positive impact on workplace bullying. Support your response with additional
information from the textbook or additional research.
Your paper must be two to three
pages (not including title and reference pages) and must be formatted according
to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide. You must cite two
scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.
Carefully review theGrading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to
evaluate your assignment.
BUS600.W5A1.05.2014
Description:
Total
Possible Score: 8.00
Provides a Review of the Article and Describes the Impact of Workplace
Bullying
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Provides a
comprehensive review of the article and thoroughly describes the impact of
workplace bullying on both the victims and the organization.
Proficient – Provides a review
of the article and describes the impact of workplace bullying on both the
victims and the organization. The review or the description is slightly
underdeveloped.
Basic – Provides a partial
review of the article and vaguely describes the impact of workplace bullying on
both the victims and the organization. The review and/or the description are
underdeveloped.
Below Expectations – Attempts
to provide a review of the article and describe the impact of workplace
bullying on both the victims and the organization; however, the review and the
description are significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance – The review
of the article and the description of the impact of workplace bullying are
either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment
instructions.
Discusses at Least Two Practices of Workplace Bullying
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly
discusses at least two practices of workplace bullying. Expertly utilizes
strong relevant examples to support the discussion.
Proficient – Discusses at
least two practices of workplace bullying. Sufficiently utilizes relevant
examples to support the discussion.
Basic – Partially discusses at
least two practices of workplace bullying. Utilizes general examples to support
the discussion.
Below Expectations – Attempts
to discuss at least two practices of workplace bullying; however, does not
utilize examples to support the discussion.
Non-Performance – The
discussion of at least two practices of workplace bullying is either
nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Recommends at Least Two Techniques That Management Should Implement
Total: 2.50
Distinguished –
Comprehensively recommends at least two techniques that management should
implement to provide a positive impact on workplace bullying. Expertly applies
vocabulary and concepts from the text and/or scholarly sources.
Proficient – Recommends at
least two techniques that management should implement to provide a positive
impact on workplace bullying. Sufficiently applies vocabulary and concepts from
the text and/or scholarly sources, but minor details are missing.
Basic – Vaguely recommends at
least two techniques that management should implement to provide a positive
impact on workplace bullying. Somewhat applies vocabulary and concepts from the
text and/or scholarly sources, and relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts
to recommend at least two techniques that management should implement to
provide a positive impact on workplace bullying; however, vocabulary and
concepts from the text and/or scholarly sources are not applied, and
significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The
recommendation of at least two techniques that management should implement is
either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment
instructions.
Integrative Learning: Connections to Experience
Total: 0.30
Distinguished – Creates
meaningful correlations among experiences outside of the classroom to deepen
understanding of field of study and to broaden own viewpoints.
Proficient – Compares life
experiences and academic knowledge to distinguish differences and similarities
while acknowledging perspectives other than own.
Basic – Recognizes correlation
between life experiences, academic texts, and ideas perceived as similar and
related to own interests.
Below Expectations – Briefly
comments about connections between life experiences and academic texts.
Non-Performance – The
assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
instructions.
Creative Thinking: Solving Problems
Total: 0.20
Distinguished – Develops a
logical, consistent plan to solve a problem, identifies consequences of the
solution, and can clearly communicate the reason for choosing the solution.
Proficient – Carefully chooses
among alternatives, and develops a logical, consistent approach to problem
solving.
Basic – Takes into account and
eliminates less acceptable approaches to problem solving.
Below Expectations – Takes
into account a single approach and uses the approach to problem solving.
Non-Performance – The
assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
instructions.
Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
Total: 0.20
Distinguished – Clearly and
comprehensively explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering all
relevant information necessary for a full understanding.
Proficient – Clearly explains
in detail the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information
for an adequate understanding.
Basic – Briefly recognizes the
issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic
understanding.
Below Expectations – Briefly
recognizes the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional
information necessary for a basic understanding.
Non-Performance – The assignment
is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.20
Distinguished – Displays
meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as
spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to
understand.
Proficient – Displays
comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and
grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to
understand.
Basic – Displays basic
comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written
work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations – Fails to
display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and
grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The
assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
instructions.
APA Formatting
Total: 0.20
Distinguished – Accurately
uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and
reference page.
Proficient – Exhibits APA
formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits basic
knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet
all APA requirements.
Below Expectations – Fails to
exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making
the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The
assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
instructions.
Page Requirement
Total: 0.20
Distinguished – The length of
the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient – The length of the
paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic – The length of the
paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of
correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations – The
length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number
of correctly formatted pages.
Non-Performance – The
assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
instructions.
Resource Requirement
Total: 0.20
Distinguished – Uses more than
the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to
support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly
within the body of the assignment.
Proficient – Uses required
number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page
are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic – Uses less than the
required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly.
Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment.
Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations – Uses
inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas.
Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not
used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance – The
assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
instructions.
